Logistics
July 16, 2025
|
A good freight plan does more than move goods; it helps control costs, protect profit margins, and keep customers satisfied. As per Contimod Statistics, transportation typically accounts for around 50-60% of total logistics costs, making mode selection critical to profitability. Choosing the wrong freight model can quietly erode margins through higher costs, increased damage claims, and delivery delays.
In today’s fast-paced supply chains, operations and logistics managers must strike a balance between speed, cost, and risk. Should you choose Less‑Than‑Truckload (LTL) to share costs for smaller loads? Or Full Truckload (FTL) to secure direct transit and lower handling risks?
This guide breaks down exactly when to use LTL vs FTL, compares cost structures, transit times, and hidden risks, and provides a practical checklist to help you select the right freight model every time, supported by real case studies and expert insights.
LTL stands for Less‑Than‑Truckload. Instead of paying for an entire truck, your freight shares space with shipments from other companies. LTL runs on a hub-and-spoke network, moving through terminals where freight is sorted and reloaded. This makes it cost-effective for loads that weigh between 150 and 10,000 pounds, or approximately 1–10 pallets. Small and mid-sized businesses often use LTL to send smaller shipments, avoiding space waste and paying only the full truck rate.
FTL stands for Full Truckload. Your shipment occupies the entire trailer; no other cargo is on board. It goes directly from pickup to delivery with no stops for unloading and reloading along the way. This reduces handling, keeps goods safer, and speeds up transit. FTL is typically best suited for larger loads, weighing 10,000 pounds or more, or freight that requires special handling. Many manufacturers, retailers, or large distributors rely on FTL for full loads or high-value cargo.
A Transportation Management System (TMS) is critical in logistics because it controls transport costs and improves operations. It optimizes routes, picks the best carrier rates, and maximizes truck capacity through smart LTL and FTL strategies. Real-time tracking, automated billing, and performance analytics make logistics more efficient and cost-effective — ensuring fresher products and timely deliveries, especially for food manufacturers.
Senior Manager Logistics, CBL
Cost is one of the first factors supply chain managers look at when comparing FTL and LTL. LTL shipments use a shared-cost model. You only pay for the portion of trailer space your freight occupies, with pricing based on freight class, distance, and weight. For small loads, LTL is a cost-effective option. However, when a shipment exceeds approximately 6–12 pallets or more than 10,000 pounds, the per-unit cost can shift, making it more cost-effective to pay a flat rate for a dedicated full truckload than to pay for multiple partial loads. Many mid-sized shippers closely monitor this break-even point to avoid hidden costs that can accumulate when they continue using LTL for an extended period.
The actual size of your shipment plays a significant role in determining whether to choose LTL or FTL. LTL works best for partial pallet loads, typically from 1 to 6 pallets, or shipments under 15,000 pounds. This is ideal when you have small batches going to multiple destinations. However, when your shipment exceeds 6–18 pallets, you may want to consider volume LTL or partial truckload, a middle-ground option that combines the benefits of both. Once your freight is large enough to nearly fill a trailer, a dedicated FTL run makes more sense. It eliminates the waste of paying for extra handling and transfers while giving you full use of the truck’s capacity.
One of the most significant practical differences between Full Truckload (FTL) and Less-Than-Truckload (LTL) shipping is transit time and reliability. FTL shipments typically move directly from pickup to delivery without intermediate stops, making them faster and more predictable. In contrast, LTL shipments are consolidated with other freight and pass through multiple terminals and transfer points, which can lead to delays and increased variability in delivery times. According to the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, LTL shipments can take up to 2-3 days longer on average compared to FTL shipments over similar distances, particularly on long-haul routes. This difference in transit time and predictability is why many shippers prefer FTL for time-sensitive or high-value cargo where on-time delivery is critical.
The number of times your freight is handled along the way can mean the difference between a perfect delivery and costly damage claims. LTL shipments are loaded and unloaded multiple times at different terminals, which naturally raises the risk of dents, scratches, or worse, especially for fragile or high-value goods. In contrast, FTL shipments are loaded once at the shipper’s dock and stay sealed until they reach the final destination. That direct path minimizes touchpoints. Industry research indicates that shippers can lose as much as 34 cents on every dollar of damaged product, once you factor in lost revenue and damage to their brand reputation. For anything delicate or easily damaged, paying for a dedicated truck is often worth it.
Not every shipment has a fixed schedule or steady volume, and that’s where LTL shines. If your shipping needs change on a weekly basis, LTL makes it easy to move smaller loads without waiting to fill an entire truck. Many smaller businesses and seasonal shippers rely on this flexibility to match their freight moves to actual demand. FTL, by contrast, works best when you have regular, predictable shipments that can fill a trailer. Booking FTL usually means you’ll need to lock in appointments, plan, and sometimes even commit to contracts for steady capacity. That trade-off between control and flexibility is why many companies blend both models to match freight to business needs.
Freight decisions don’t just affect your bottom line; they also shape your company’s environmental footprint. LTL shipping can help reduce emissions for partial loads by combining multiple shipments into a single truck that would otherwise run half-empty. By sharing space, companies reduce wasted miles and lower fuel use per ton shipped. Studies show that thoughtful LTL planning can reduce emissions by up to 30% per ton-mile compared to sending the same freight as multiple under-filled truckloads. FTL can be just as efficient if the trailer is packed to capacity; however, empty backhauls or partial loads can quickly waste fuel. That’s why many shippers pair FTL with careful load planning or use hybrid models to keep trucks full both ways.
FTL shipments travel directly from the point of origin to the destination without stops for other freight. This significantly reduces transit time, making FTL ideal for time-sensitive shipments. Faster movement also improves schedule reliability, ensuring on-time pickups and deliveries with fewer risks of unexpected delays along the route.
FTL shipping minimizes the number of times cargo is handled, as the shipment remains on the same truck throughout its journey. This reduces exposure to potential damage, theft, or misplacement. With fewer touchpoints and limited human intervention, FTL provides higher security and safety for fragile or high-value goods.
For shipments that nearly fill or fully occupy a truck, FTL becomes more economical compared to splitting the load into multiple LTL shipments. Larger shipments incur lower per-unit transport costs, making FTL an efficient choice for bulk cargo, manufacturing runs, or distribution to major retailers that require high-volume deliveries.
Products that are fragile, hazardous, or sensitive to damage benefit greatly from FTL shipping. Since the cargo is loaded once and stays sealed until delivery, there’s minimal handling. This makes FTL the preferred option for transporting delicate electronics, medical equipment, or regulated goods requiring careful movement and compliance.
FTL simplifies logistics operations by reducing the number of parties involved and eliminating unnecessary transfers. This operational clarity enables businesses to plan routes more effectively, manage timing more efficiently, and maintain end-to-end visibility. With fewer moving parts, shippers gain greater control over delivery schedules, carrier performance, and overall freight management.
FTL is not financially viable for small shipments, typically under 15,000 pounds or fewer than 10 pallets. In such cases, businesses pay for unused space, making LTL a better choice. Without enough volume to justify a full truck, the per-unit cost of FTL becomes unnecessarily expensive.
FTL shipping is less flexible for companies with unpredictable freight volumes or sporadic shipping needs. Booking full truckloads often requires planning, appointment setting, and sometimes contractual commitments. This rigid structure makes it challenging for businesses that need short-notice deliveries or whose shipping patterns fluctuate seasonally or unpredictably.
Unlike LTL carriers, which often provide additional services like liftgates, inside delivery, or special handling, FTL carriers typically focus solely on point-to-point transportation. This can be a drawback for shippers requiring specialized handling or last-mile delivery features, as it reduces the overall convenience and service customization available.
FTL can contribute to higher carbon emissions, especially when trucks are not fully loaded or return empty after deliveries. By contrast, LTL shipping consolidates multiple shipments in one truck, maximizing efficiency. For businesses with sustainability goals, this lower environmental efficiency may be a factor against choosing FTL.
The FTL sector faces challenges from industry-wide driver shortages, which can limit truck availability and increase costs. Additionally, many FTL carriers lack sophisticated tracking systems, making real-time freight visibility difficult. This lack of transparency can create uncertainty and complicate planning for freight brokers, shippers, and customers.
LTL shipping enables businesses to pay only for the trailer space they utilize, thereby sharing transportation costs with other shippers. This makes it significantly more affordable than booking an entire truck, especially for small or mid-sized shipments. It’s an efficient option for companies with lower volume but frequent shipping needs.
By consolidating multiple shipments into a single truck, LTL reduces the number of vehicles on the road, thereby lowering overall fuel consumption and carbon emissions. This shared shipping model makes LTL a greener alternative to under-filled FTL loads, aligning with sustainability goals and helping businesses reduce their environmental impact.
LTL freight is typically loaded onto shrink-wrapped pallets, which keeps items together and reduce the risk of individual package loss or damage compared to parcel shipping services. This additional security layer is particularly beneficial for businesses shipping medium-sized goods that don’t warrant a full truckload but require more protection.
LTL carriers often offer a wider range of services than FTL providers, including residential deliveries, liftgate services, and inside delivery. This flexibility is valuable for businesses serving diverse customers, including non-commercial destinations, making LTL a practical choice for e-commerce, small retailers, and multi-location distribution.
For companies shipping smaller quantities to multiple locations—such as retailers supplying several stores, LTL can be more efficient than sending a large load to a central warehouse. This direct-to-location approach saves time, reduces handling costs, and enables faster replenishment across multiple destinations, particularly in regional or urban distribution.
LTL shipments often take longer to reach their destination because the truck makes multiple stops to load and unload freight for different customers. This extended timeline, especially for long-haul or cross-country shipments, can lead to delivery delays, making LTL less suitable for time-sensitive or urgent freight.
With numerous shippers sharing the same truck, unforeseen issues at any stop can cause cascading delays. Weather, route changes, or delays at one delivery point can impact the entire schedule, making LTL less predictable than FTL, which follows a direct, dedicated route from pickup to delivery.
Although LTL is more secure than parcel shipping, it still involves more handling, multiple stops, and shared trailer space. This increases the risk of theft, tampering, or misplaced freight, particularly for sensitive or high-value goods that would benefit from the single-point loading and sealed security of FTL shipping.
In LTL shipping, freight is often loaded and unloaded multiple times to accommodate other shipments along the route. This frequent handling increases the chance of goods being dropped, crushed, or otherwise damaged, making LTL less ideal for fragile or delicate items that require careful handling.
LTL shipping works best for flexible schedules and standard palletised freight. It’s less suited for oversized, unusually shaped, or extremely time-sensitive shipments, which may not align with LTL routing constraints. In such cases, FTL is the better choice despite the higher cost, due to its directness and reliability.
Shipping plans rarely remain the same throughout the year. A load that makes sense as LTL in off-peak months might shift to FTL when seasonal sales spike. As per an MIT study on freight volume forecasting, many retailers run partial shipments for small restocks but switch to dedicated full truckloads ahead of significant sales or holiday surges to secure capacity and expedite delivery.
Some companies choose LTL because it lets them bring in products in smaller batches, which reduces storage costs and keeps inventory fresher. Others prefer FTL to build a buffer stock for unexpected spikes or to meet minimum order quantities from upstream suppliers. The correct mode depends on how much product you can hold and how tight your dock space is.
It’s not always the shipper who calls the shots. Some suppliers require full truckload minimums for bulk orders, while others have standing LTL pool agreements to keep smaller replenishments moving. Contract terms, vendor penalties, and order lead times all play into which mode works best for your supply chain relationships.
Every business has a unique appetite for risk and a distinct process for handling damage claims. Some shippers accept the small extra handling risk of LTL because lower upfront rates balance out an occasional claim. Others can’t afford any damage at all for example, shipping fragile glass or regulated products, so they default to sealed truckloads. Reviewing your claims history helps set clearer thresholds for when to choose either mode.
According to the Global Tranz Report, during tight market conditions, finding guaranteed FTL capacity can be more challenging than booking space on an LTL network. That already operates regular routes. Some companies plan mixed strategies on purpose: run FTL when trucks are available and cost-effective, then fall back on LTL when capacity is tight.
Long-term freight contracts for dedicated lanes can lock in favorable FTL pricing, but they usually require consistent volume to remain effective. If your order flow is unpredictable, flexible LTL pricing may save you money compared to paying penalties for underused FTL contract lanes. Reviewing past usage and forecasting accuracy helps choose the smarter contract approach.
A Transportation Management System (TMS) can make a big difference here, automating load consolidation, checking real-time carrier availability, and analyzing past lanes to show when to bundle shipments into full truckloads or break them out for LTL. Companies with robust TMS tools often combine both modes more strategically and keep total costs lower over the year.
Choosing between FTL and LTL is only part of the freight management equation. The real challenge lies in managing the end-to-end processes behind freight planning, documentation, carrier coordination, and shipment tracking—areas that can significantly affect costs, efficiency, and customer satisfaction.
To address these challenges, many logistics businesses turn to specialized logistics outsourcing solutions from providers like Invensis Technologies. With over 25 years of industry experience, Invensis helps freight forwarders, shippers, and logistics providers streamline operations by handling:
By outsourcing these operational functions, businesses can free up internal teams to focus on strategic priorities while improving accuracy, reducing overheads, and enhancing shipment reliability. Whether your business relies on FTL, LTL, or a combination of both, logistics outsourcing can help maintain agility, control costs, and enhance service levels, especially in today’s rapidly changing market landscape.
Discover how Invensis can enhance your freight operations and optimize your supply chain performance.
FTL and LTL each bring clear strengths to the table. FTL offers speed and control for large or time-critical shipments, while LTL keeps costs in check for smaller loads that don’t fill a trailer. Many businesses use both, pairing FTL for long hauls with LTL for local deliveries or smaller runs. The real value lies in knowing when to switch between the two and planning to avoid wasted space, unexpected costs, or service gaps. As freight networks become more complex, utilizing data, thoughtful load planning, and trusted 3PL partners can make this choice more straightforward and profitable.
LTL means your freight shares space with other shipments, which spreads the cost but involves extra stops and handling. FTL provides you with the entire truck for a single shipment, allowing it to move directly to the destination without transfers.
For smaller, lighter shipments that don’t fill a trailer, LTL is usually more practical and budget-friendly. It helps companies avoid paying for empty trailer space when they don’t have sufficient volume to justify a dedicated truck.
FTL tends to deliver faster because the truck makes no extra stops for other freight. While exact time savings vary, direct full truckload runs often cut out delays caused by terminal transfers.
It often makes sense to switch when your regular loads are large enough to nearly fill a trailer, usually around 10,000 pounds or about half the trailer’s floor space. At that point, a dedicated truck can save money and reduce the risk of damage.
Yes. Many supply chains combine both: they might move large volumes long-distance by FTL, then break shipments down locally using LTL. This helps balance cost, speed, and flexibility.
.webp "Medium")
Eric is a seasoned professional in the field of analytics, bringing a wealth of knowledge and expertise to his writing. With years of experience, he skillfully analyzes complex data and extracts valuable insights effortlessly. Eric's proficiency extends across diverse domains, consistently delivering actionable recommendations and implementing data-driven strategies. He excels in data visualization, predictive modeling, and optimizing performance. As a prominent writer in the analytics space, Eric is highly regarded for providing concise and practical advice, empowering businesses to make informed decisions and unlock the full potential of their data.
Blog Category
Discover how AI is revolutionizing logistics through smarter demand forecasting, optimized routing, automated warehouses, enhanced customer service, and improved risk detection.
July 3, 2025
|
Explore the 2025 Netherlands BPO market and its size, key trends, challenges, and growth outlook with insights on technology, nearshoring, and compliance.
July 3, 2025
|
Adding products to your store is easy with our guide on how to upload products in BigCommerce. Follow these steps for a seamless upload experience.
July 15, 2025
|
.webp)